Found it on a Risks Digest and decided to copy the whole post here - just in case it goes missing. The posting is quite long. It is an internl Silicon Graphics memo by Tom Davis and it is a great representation of what can go wrong with (any) big (or small) software project
CITATION STARTS
CITATION STARTS
Jerry Leichter <leichter@lrw.com> Tue, 26 Apr 94 08:42:32 EDT
The following, which claims to be an internal Silicon Graphics memo, has already seen fairly broad network distribution. I have no way of verifying that it is what it claims to be, but (a) I'm told by someone with close dealings with SGI that it fits with what he's heard; (b) if it's a fake, someone put a huge amount of effort into producing it. I forward it to RISKS as a wonderful record of what goes wrong with large software projects, and why. It would be as useful if all the names, including the company and product names, were removed. This memo should not be seen as an indictment of SGI, which is hardly unique. There is good evidence that Sun, for example, had very similar problems in producing Solaris; and I watched the same thing happen with the late, unlamented DEC Professional series of PC's, and something like it almost happen with firmware for DEC terminals a number of years back.